Thus, the 1600 AF which is basically the same CPU for a further discount is just an insane deal.ĪMD is putting the hurt on Intel with parts like this. As we said earlier, the Rywas already amazing value at $120. Power consumption is inline with the 2600, with a slight advantage out of the box due to the minor decrease in clock speed, though this can vary depending on silicon quality.įor budget builders with access to the 1600 AF at $85, there is simply no better choice. In other words, the RyAF is not only cheaper than the original 1600 and faster out of the box, but it should also overclock better. Our original R5 1600 chip also does 4 GHz and that seems to be about as good as you can realistically hope for with the older processor. Some chips might only do 4 GHz depending on silicon quality, some or rather few might exceed 4.2 GHz, but based on reports we've seen 4.2 GHz seems like the upper end of the overclocking results. Our chip - which we bought from retail - hit 4.2 GHz using 1.4v and that's the same overclock achieved by the R5 2600 retail part we have on hand. Speaking of which, you can of course overclock the 1600 AF as it's fully unlocked. It's a Rywith very minor reduction in clock speed. That was our quick look at how the RyAF performs and the results were as positive as we expected. The margins are reduced slightly at 1440p, but overall a similar story. The 1600 AF also shows good 1% low improvements in Total War Three Kingdoms, beating the 1600 by a 16% margin at 1080p to coming in 1-2 fps behind the 2600. This means out of the box the AF was 12% faster than the original 1600.įor single core performance the 2600 was 1.5% faster than the 1600 AF and that makes the new 12nm 1600 is 10% faster than the original. Benchmarksįirst up we have the Cinebench R20 multi-core performance and here the 1600 AF basically matched the 2600, less than a 1% margin in it. Armed with that information, let's jump into our tests which we'll power through as the results aren't surprising and don't require much explanation.įor testing we're using the Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master with 16GB of G.Skill's FlareX DDR4-3200 memory and a RTX 2080 Ti GPU. The CPU seems to be readily available in the United States, but it's not sold everywhere.īefore we get into the blue bar graphs, here's a look at how the 1600 AF clocks compared to the original 1600 AE model, as well as the 2600: running a heavy Blender workload, the original 1600 operates at 3.4 GHz, the new AF model maintained 3.7 GHz and the 2600 runs at 3.8 GHz.įrom this test alone, it would appear like the 1600 AF could be up to 3% slower than the 2600 out of the box, but it's way cheaper. The original 14nm Rywas a great deal at a little over $100 and the Rywas killer at $120, but the RyAF blows them both out of the water at just $85. That's a Zen+ 6-core, 12-thread part for just $85 brand new. These underclocked R圜PUs cost a mere $85. Apparently AMD didn't have enough 14nm wafers available to keep producing the R5 1600, so they simply shifted it to the 12nm process and now they're making a version of the R5 2600 that they call the R5 1600.Īt this point you may be asking yourself, why do I care that AMD is making new products and selling them under old names? Seems counterproductive, but the reason you should care is price. Essentially it's an R5 2600 with a slight decrease in clock speed. Known as the "RyAF" because of the box identification, it's very different to the original RyAE model.įorget about the name, this is a 2nd-gen Ryzen part. Bizarrely, AMD released a really cheap version of the Ryzen 5 2600, but just called it the Ryzen 5 1600. Late last year a mysterious Ryrefresh made it to market. Here the replacement was the Ryzen 5 3600, another (incredibly good) $200 part. Because the more refined process was more efficient, AMD downgraded the cooler to the Wraith Stealth.Īfter one more year, we got the current generation Zen 2 processors. It ran at a base clock of 3.4 GHz with an all-core of 3.7 GHz. It was also a 6-core processor, but featuring updated 12nm Zen+ cores. It's a 6-core, 12-thread part clocked at 3.2 GHz for the base with an all-core boost clock of 3.4 GHz and cooled using the Wraith Spire.Ībout a year later, AMD replaced it with the Ryat $200. To quickly recap, the Rywas released in April 2017 for $220, based on the original 14nm Zen architecture. Today we're checking out the 12nm version of the Rythat despite the name, is a new CPU that's only been on the market for a few months. AMD's first-gen Ryzen chips continue to sell as budget alternatives to the newer generations and the Ryzen 5 1600/2600 products in particular are very attractive for budget builds.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |